was agriculture the worst mistake in human history

Germs, and Steel has written that rather than being a step forward, agriculture was a mistake. Agriculture was the Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race (Adapted from Jared Diamond’s 1987 essay) Traditionally historians view farming as a major advance in human history.

Full
Answer

Is agriculture the worst mistake in the history of the human race?

Several consider agriculture to be the worst mistake in human history because of sexual inequality, health issues, increase of population, and new authority. Although, I do not agree …

Did we make the worst mistake in human history?

 · Archaeologists studying the rise of farming have reconstructed a crucial stage at which we made the worst mistake in human history. Forced to choose between limiting …

Why was agriculture bad for Health in the past?

Is agriculture a success or failure?

What was the worst mistake in human history?

No doubt the bad well and truly outweighs all the good that came from the invention of farming all those millenia ago. Jared Diamond was right, the invention of agriculture was without doubt the biggest blunder in human history.

What was bad about agriculture?

Agriculture is the leading source of pollution in many countries. Pesticides, fertilizers and other toxic farm chemicals can poison fresh water, marine ecosystems, air and soil. They also can remain in the environment for generations.

Did agriculture make life better?

When early humans began farming, they were able to produce enough food that they no longer had to migrate to their food source. This meant they could build permanent structures, and develop villages, towns, and eventually even cities. Closely connected to the rise of settled societies was an increase in population.

Did agriculture reduce human lifespan?

For the existence of sin in the form of cultivation, the lifespan of people became shortened.” It is conceivable that food shortages in the pre-agricultural era produced healthier individuals because of reduced caloric intake, which is known to delay the onset of age-related pathologies and to extend the lifespan3.

Was farming a good idea?

As farming provided humans with much greater quantities of food than hunting and gathering could, populations grew. Storage of surpluses made it unnecessary for every woman and man to farm for themselves and their family. Job specialization became possible, with different people specializing in different tasks.

Did agriculture cause social inequality?

In a report that appears this week in the journal Nature, Kohler reports that increasing inequality arrived with agriculture. When people started growing more crops, settling down and building cities, the rich usually got much richer, compared to the poor.

Was agriculture good or bad?

By radically changing the way we acquire our food, the development of agriculture has condemned us to live worse than ever before. Not only that, agriculture has led to the first significant instances of large-scale war, inequality, poverty, crime, famine and human induced climate change and mass extinction.

Was the agricultural revolution a mistake?

Archaeologists studying the rise of farming have reconstructed a crucial stage at which we made the worst mistake in human history. Forced to choose between limiting population or trying to increase food production, we chose the latter and ended up with starvation, warfare, and tyranny.

Why do some refer to agriculture as humanity’s worst mistake?

Besides malnutrition, starvation, and epidemic diseases, farming helped bring another curse upon humanity: deep class divisions. Hunter-gatherers have little or no stored food, and no concentrated food sources, like an orchard or a herd of cows: they live off the wild plants and animals they obtain each day.

What is the average age of death?

The United Nations estimate a global average life expectancy of 72.6 years for 2019 – the global average today is higher than in any country back in 1950.

What was the life expectancy during the agricultural revolution?

Averaging rates across 29 paleodemographic life tables indicates that hunter-gatherers have a mean expectation of life of 21.6 years; horticulturalists, a mean of 21.2 years; and agriculturalists, 24.9 years.

Do hunter gatherers live longer?

In hunter-gatherer groups, life was, and is, undeniably hard, but their lifespan was not as short as the numbers press us to think. If you were a hunter-gatherer and you made it to adolescence, there was a strong likelihood that you would live a long and healthy life – not so different from modern humans.

How many times has agriculture been invented?

But as it happens it wasn’t invented just once but actually originated at least seven times, and perhaps 11 times, and quite independently, as far as we know.

Why were early farmers poorer than hunter-gatherers?

In most places the health of early farmers was much poorer than their hunter-gatherer ancestors because of the narrower range of foods they consumed alongside of widespread dietary deficiencies.

Why did the early farmers have a smaller skull?

Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers had larger skulls due to their more mobile and active lifestyle including a diet which required much more chewing.

What was Abu Hereyra’s diet?

The diet of Abu Hereyra’s occupants dropped from more than 150 wild plants consumed as hunter-gatherers to just a handful of crops as farmers . In the Americas, where maize was domesticated and heavily relied upon as a staple crop, iron absorption was consequently low and dramatically increased the incidence of anaemia.

How many hectares were built in the early days of the world?

People began to build settlements covering more than ten hectares – the size of ten rugby fields – which were permanently occupied. Early towns housed up to ten thousand people within rectangular stone houses with doors on their roofs at archaeological sites like Çatalhöyük in Turkey.

What caused the rapid spread of infectious disease?

Crowded conditions in these new settlements, human waste, animal handling and pest species attracted to them led to increased illness and the rapid spread of infectious disease.

What was the sudden increase in the number of human settlements signalling a marked shift in population?

While maternal and infant mortality increased, female fertility rose with farming, the fuel in the engine of population growth.

What was the worst mistake in the history of the human race?

Jared Diamond’s breakthrough 1987 article, “Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race” claims agriculture did not deliver the splendors of civilization but was instead a highway to hell . This section examines the traditional progressivist perspective on agriculture and the sources for Diamond’s revisionism, including passages that seem plagiarized from earlier anthropological work, especially from a book titled Man the Hunter.

Who argued that agriculture was a source of sexual inequality?

Rubin drew on an already-existing critique that agriculture was a source for sexual inequality, most clearly seen in Friedrich Engels, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (1884). Rubin ’s injunction remains unfinished:

What did Lee and Sahlins do to the idea of gatherers and hunters?

Lee and Sahlins, as later popularized but unacknowledged by Diamond, were fundamental for re-evaluating the idea of gatherers and hunters as barely scratching out an existence. Agriculture increased necessary work time and drudgery, although it did make possible specialization, so that not everyone had to be directly involved in procuring food. Some people could then specialize in other pursuits. But agriculture did not directly increase free time or leisure. (See Affluence Without Abundance for a 2017 in-depth ethnographic update.)

How much time do bushmen spend on food?

It turns out that these people have plenty of leisure time, sleep a good deal, and work less hard than their farming neighbors. For instance, the average time devoted each week to obtaining food is only 12 to 19 hours for one group of Bushmen, 14 hours or less for the Hadza nomads of Tanzania. One Bushman, when asked why he hadn’t emulated neighboring tribes by adopting agriculture, replied, “Why should we, when there are so many mongongo nuts in the world?” (Diamond 1987, 65)

How did humans live in the past?

People lived from gathering and hunting. Around 15,000 years ago, in some parts of the world, this would change, as people began more intensively cultivating plants and herding animals. These processes are known as domestication or the transition to agriculture, conceived as a watershed moment in human history, the time when human history begins. Note the similar root words behind culture, agriculture, and cultivation.

What did humans do before cultivation?

According to dominant mythology, prior to cultivation, humans lived in a “wild man” state, not very different from the non-human animals they hunted. With domestication, humans tame and control these wild animals, and in the process begin to tame and control themselves.

What is the most successful life style in human history?

Hunter-gatherers practiced the most successful and longest-lasting life style in human history. In contrast, we’re still struggling with the mess into which agriculture has tumbled us, and it’s unclear whether we can solve it. Suppose that an archaeologist who had visited from outer space were trying to explain human history to his fellow spacelings. He might illustrate the results of his digs by a 24-hour clock on which one hour represents 100,000 years of real past time. If the history of the human race began at midnight, then we would now be almost at the end of our first day. We lived as hunter-gatherers for nearly the whole of that day, from midnight through dawn, noon, and sunset. Finally, at 11:54 p. m. we adopted agriculture. As our second midnight approaches, will the plight of famine-stricken peasants gradually spread to engulf us all? Or will we somehow achieve those seductive blessings that we imagine behind agriculture’s glittering façade, and that have so far eluded us?

Why was agriculture bad?

Firstly as already hinted, it was extremely bad for our health, hunter gatherers revelled in a varied diet, while farmers subsisted on just a few species (wheat, rice and corn) which provided cheap calories at the cost of inadequate nutrition.

Why was farming necessary in the Midwest?

Instead it proved to be a necessity in order to feed a rapidly growing population. Essentially, the people remained hunters for as long as possible, before making the necessary switch- it was a conscious trade of quality for quantity.

How did humans survive in the 200,000 year history?

For the majority of our 200,000 year existence, we have supported ourselves exclusively through hunting and gathering. Essentially we hunted wild animals and foraged for wild plants either for food or other means such as acquiring tools and materials. Traditionally thinkers regarded this lifestyle as nasty, brutish and short. What with the little or no food stored, surely each day was a struggle to find enough wild food to stave off starvation. The discovery of agriculture, according to this viewpoint was an escape from this infernal misery. It’s hard to consider agriculture as anything other than a success when you realise that its reach is now virtually global, with the nasty and brutish hunter gatherers confined to some of the remotest regions of the planet.

Why did hunter gatherers abandon their old lifestyle?

They abandoned their old lifestyle because agriculture presented a more efficient way to get more food for far less exertion. Planted crops after all yield far more than wild plants over a similar sized area. Try to imagine an exhausted hunting party suddenly stumbling across a lush and fertile orchard or a pasture full of domestic and docile sheep or cows. I’d wager that the majority of them would appreciate the benefits of agriculture almost immediately.

What is the most successful life style in human history?

Hunting and gathering was and is the most successful life style in human history, it has sustained us and our precursor human species for over two million years. Meanwhile, agriculture is a 10,000 year experiment that has undoubtedly gone horribly wrong, both for us and most of the other living creatures that share this world with us. It remains to be seen whether we have the capability of solving this fundamental problem and rectify our mistake. The only real certainty is that if we don’t undo the damage of the last 10,000 years, then the results will not be pretty, in fact they will be horrible for us, but more importantly for our children, grandchildren and the rest of life on earth.

Did agriculture bring forth art?

The claim that agriculture brought forth a spectacular flowering of art and culture, through the procurement of more leisure time is false. Modern hunter gatherers have in fact more free time than third world farmers and even us rich Westerners. In my humble opinion, focusing on leisure time seems rather misguided. After all, our great ape cousins have had ample free time to develop civilisation, if they wanted to. Admittedly agriculture did allow for new technologies to develop, which thus allowed new art forms to emerge. But remember that great works of art were already being produced more than 15,000 years ago in places such as Southern France, Spain and Australia.

Do hunter gatherers have a story?

However, it’s important to note that virtually all modern hunter gatherers have had at least some contact with farming communities for centuries, even millennia. Therefore, modern hunter gatherers cannot give us the full story about conditions prior to the Neolithic Revolution. Thus one must rely on archaeology both to determine when the switch occurred and whether the health of our ancestors improved after the switch.

Why is agriculture the worst mistake in human history?

Several consider agriculture to be the worst mistake in human history because of sexual inequality, health issues, increase of population, and new authority. Although, I do not agree with the statement because I cannot imagine our society in 2016 hunting for food. Therefore, is important to clarify several points regarding agricultural and hunter-gathers to why the increase of population, the health problems, and the socializations time.

How did farming become successful?

Farming was originally successful by the lords forcing the servants to work on their farms. With the Black Plague there, the small amount of peasants that survived were not enough to cover the work that needed to be done on the farms. The lords had to pay for laborers to come do the work. Also, Stewards were created to manage the fields and collect runt from tenant farmers. The lack of peasants also forced the farmers to improve farming techniques to become more efficient doing less work and producing the same amount.…

How does Kenya improve its food security?

For a food secure nation, Kenya still has to inject more into quality seeds Poor quality of the seed used translates to a small cost that is incurred to sustain a well fed economy. The farm yields diminish and the economic losses to the farmers are likely to be much greater. By Juma Chrispinus Farm inputs amongst small scale farmers including seeds, agrochemicals and fertilizers are key in improving agricultural yield. In order to achieve considerable yields, small scale farmers should be able to adopt good agricultural practices and have access to inputs. However, access to and eventually the use of the right inputs remain a challenge in areas where the field extension officers are hardly available, and as such farmers revert to using counterfeit…

What are the differences between hunter-gatherers and farmers?

The diet of a hunter-gatherers, a variety of wild plants and animals, provides more protein and a better balance of nutrients, whereas farmers specialize in growing crops that are high in carbohydrates, like potatoes and rice. In many instances throughout the world, this shift to a less nutritious diet has led to many health defects. For example, when archeologists compared the indigenous skeletons of farmers in Illinois with the hunter-gatherers who preceded them, it was found that those who practices intensive maize agriculture had an increase in enamel defects, iron-deficiency anemia, and bone lesions. In addition, these skeletons had an increase in degenerative conditions of the spine, which might reflect an increase in physical labor due to agriculture. Diamond also claims that this dietary shift in human populations has caused an overall decrease in height.…

Why is commercial farming important?

The use of commercial farming in addition to subsistence farming seemed a promising prospect for increased economic stability and food security but without access to better technology the ability to sustainably produce food is limited. In the United states poor management of arable land and the increase of population and therefore development is impeding the ability to produce food for the population. Subsistence farming, unlike in south Africa, is not widely known and the lack of knowledge for low income families is decreasing their food…

How does factory farming affect the environment?

This type of farming could lead to even more widespread environmental degradation and result in less food to feed the world. With having the factory farms, prices of meats may go down but with it damaging land it will end up costing people more in the end. They also will hurt countries that are already struggling and their only profit is traditional farming but the factory farms take that away from them. William J. Weicla says that “In reality factory farms are not agricultural enterprises but industrial conglomerates that shift the costs of pollution to others for the sake of profit.” Modern technology has allowed producers to grow large amounts of cheap food to feed the world.…

Why did people develop hunting and gathering?

At the beginning of human existents, people developed the technique of hunting and gathering because that’s how they supported themselves at that time. “Hunter-gatherers, sometimes called foragers, lived in small groups, large enough to defend themselves and divide tasks yet small enough not to exhaust food …show more content…

Why was agriculture bad for health?

First, hunter-gatherers enjoyed a varied diet, while early farmers obtained most of their food from one or a few starchy crops.

How did farming affect inequality?

Farming may have encouraged inequality between the sexes, as well. Freed from the need to transport their babies during a nomadic existence, and under pressure to produce more hands to till the fields, farming women tended to have more frequent pregnancies than their hunter-gatherer counterparts — with consequent drains on their health. Among the Chilean mummies for example, more women than men had bone lesions from infectious disease.

What are some examples of paleopathologists’ learning from skeletons?

One straight forward example of what paleopathologists have learned from skeletons concerns historical changes in height. Skeletons from Greece and Turkey show that the average height of hunger-gatherers toward the end of the ice ages was a generous 5′ 9” for men, 5′ 5” for women. With the adoption of agriculture, height crashed, and by 3000 B. C. had reached a low of only 5′ 3” for men, 5′ for women. By classical times heights were very slowly on the rise again, but modern Greeks and Turks have still not regained the average height of their distant ancestors.

Why did most of our hunter-gatherer ancestors adopt agriculture?

Of course they adopted it because agriculture is an efficient way to get more food for less work. Planted crops yield far more tons per acre than roots and berries. Just imagine a band of savages, exhausted from searching for nuts or chasing wild animals, suddenly grazing for the first time at a fruit-laden orchard or a pasture full of sheep. How many milliseconds do you think it would take them to appreciate the advantages of agriculture?

Why did the Indians farm at Dickson Mounds?

The evidence suggests that the Indians at Dickson Mounds, like many other primitive peoples, took up farming not by choice but from necessity in order to feed their constantly growing numbers. “I don’t think most hunger-gatherers farmed until they had to, and when they switched to farming they traded quality for quantity,” says Mark Cohen of the State University of New York at Plattsburgh, co-editor with Armelagos, of one of the seminal books in the field, Paleopathology at the Origins of Agriculture. “When I first started making that argument ten years ago, not many people agreed with me. Now it’s become a respectable, albeit controversial, side of the debate.”

What do bushmen eat?

It’s almost inconceivable that Bushmen, who eat 75 or so wild plants , could die of starvation the way hundreds of thousands of Irish farmers and their families did during the potato famine of the 1840s.

How long does it take to get food for a bushman?

For instance, the average time devoted each week to obtaining food is only 12 to 19 hours for one group of Bushmen, 14 hours or less for the Hadza nomads of Tanzania. One Bushman, when asked why he hadn’t emulated neighboring tribes by adopting agriculture, replied, “Why should we, when there are so many mongongo nuts in the world?”

Why did most of our hunter-gatherer ancestors adopt agriculture?

Of course they adopted it because agriculture is an efficient way to get more food for less work. Planted crops yield far more tons per acre than roots and berries. Just imagine a band of savages, exhausted from searching for nuts or chasing wild animals, suddenly grazing for the first time at a fruit-laden orchard or a pasture full of sheep. How many milliseconds do you think it would take them to appreciate the advantages of agriculture?

Why did agriculture help us build the Parthenon?

Since crops can be stored, and since it takes less time to pick food from a garden than to find it in the wild, agriculture gave us free time that hunter-gatherers never had. Thus it was agriculture that enabled us to build the Parthenon and compose the B-minor Mass.

How do paleopathologists determine growth rates?

Paleopathologists can also calculate growth rates by measuring bones of people of different ages, examine teeth for enamel defects (signs of childhood malnutrition), and recognize scars left on bones by anemia, tuberculosis, leprosy, and other diseases.

Why did the Indians farm at Dickson Mounds?

The evidence suggests that the Indians at Dickson Mounds, like many other primitive peoples, took up farming not by choice but from necessity in order to feed their constantly growing numbers. “I don’t think most hunger-gatherers farmed until they had to, and when they switched to farming they traded quality for quantity,” says Mark Cohen of the State University of New York at Plattsburgh, co-editor with Armelagos, of one of the seminal books in the field, Paleopathology at the Origins of Agriculture. “When I first started making that argument ten years ago, not many people agreed with me. Now it’s become a respectable, albeit controversial, side of the debate.”

What do bushmen eat?

It’s almost inconceivable that Bushmen, who eat 75 or so wild plants , could die of starvation the way hundreds of thousands of Irish farmers and their families did during the potato famine of the 1840s.

How much more do planted crops yield per acre?

Planted crops yield far more tons per acre than roots and berries. Just imagine a band of savages, exhausted from searching for nuts or chasing wild animals, suddenly grazing for the first time at a fruit-laden orchard or a pasture full of sheep.

Which skeletons were better than commoners?

Skeletons from Greek tombs at Mycenae c. 1500 B. C. suggest that royals enjoyed a better diet than commoners, since the royal skeletons were two or three inches taller and had better teeth (on the average, one instead of six cavities or missing teeth).

What would have happened if we didn’t have agriculture?

And finally, without agriculture we could not have organized or developed our current societies – with its chain of government, education, technical advances, massive developments in healthcare, education, transport, dissemination of information and overall knowledge. We now have the most extraordinary access to an enormous wealth of information and knowledge, literally at our fingertips. For me that is an absolutely stupendous development. We would not have had the transformation provided by the scientific process. We would have no books, internet, the spread of abstract thinking, the intellectual architecture that developed after the Enlightenment – including human rights and international law; and, indeed, no discussions like this; and maybe more trivially we wouldn’t have had comforts like heating, refrigeration, and far greater protection from the elements. Less trivially (I suppose) I wouldn’t have been alive to write this and it’s a fair guess that friends of mine reading this wouldn’t be alive. And while he argues there was art under the hunter-gatherers – of course, beautiful stuff – we have had an unimaginable outpouring of creativity in all the arts for centuries – most of it made possible (not to mention the consumption of said art) by living in settled, organized societies.

Who predicted that millions of people would die from famine in the 70s and 80s?

Warnings by population alarmists like Paul Ehrlich, who predicted that “hundreds of millions” would die of famine in the 70s and 80s have proven to be wildly off target. (A very generous reading of famines in that period might put it at 4.5 million deaths – meaning that at the very least, Ehrlich was off by a factor of more than 40).

How tall were hunter-gatherers in 3000 BC?

More trivially, he comes up with the interesting fact that hunter-gatherers in the region of Turkey and Greece averaged 5ft 9 for men – and was considerably lower in 3000 BC under agriculture. I checked and it has risen above that today – even it took a long time!

What is the life expectancy of a pre-agricultural person?

Life expectancy at birth in the pre-agricultural community was about twenty-six years ,” says Armelagos, “but in the post-agricultural community it was nineteen years.

When did the population increase?

The rate of global population growth peaked in the period 1950– 1970 at nearly 2 percent per year and since then has decreased steadily. Although one can never be sure of anything in this realm, it is likely that this process will continue and that global demographic growth rates will decline to near zero in the second half of the twenty-first century. The shape of the bell curve is quite well defined (see Figure 2.2). Piketty, Thomas (2014-03-10). Capital in the Twenty-First Century (p. 99). Harvard University Press. Kindle Edition.

Is hunter-gatherer society successful?

A very basic point – in terms of survival and in terms of becoming the dominant form of human existence: hunter-gatherer societies have clearly not been successful comparatively. They are now minuscule by comparison to humans living based on agriculture and its consequences.

Is the world better off today than hunter-gatherers?

Despite continuing, serious problems, most people – a large majority of the current 7 billion on the planet – are definitely better off today by most of the usual measure ments, than they were as hunter-gatherers. (ie the classic health outcome measurements of under five mortality and longevity, and they are much less likely to die violently, not to mention access to things that hunter-gatherers couldn’t have had – like information about far away places, new and different ideas, far away peoples).

Introduction

A Highly Recommended Link

Uncovering The Evidence

Why It Was Our Biggest Mistake

• There are three clear reasons why agriculture was our biggest mistake. Firstly as already hinted, it was extremely bad for our health, hunter gatherers revelled in a varied diet, while farmers subsisted on just a few species (wheat, rice and corn) which provided cheap calories at the cost of inadequate nutrition. Even today, a large number of the f…

See more on owlcation.com

The Article That Inspired This Hub

Conclusion

Comments