Contents
- 1 What did the Agriculture Adjustment Administration do?
- 2 How did the Agricultural Adjustment help the farmers?
- 3 Why was the Agriculture Adjustment Act so important?
- 4 What was the main objective of the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
- 5 How successful was the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
- 6 What did the Agricultural Adjustment Administration accomplish?
- 7 Was the Agricultural Adjustment Act a recovery?
- 8 What were the results of the AAA?
- 9 What were the effects of the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
- 10 Why did the Agricultural Adjustment Act end?
- 11 Was the Works Progress Administration successful?
- 12 How did the Agricultural Adjustment Act help farmers?
- 13 When did the Agricultural Adjustment Act end?
- 14 What were the effects of the Agricultural Adjustment Act quizlet?
- 15 Did the Public Works Administration work?
- 16 Why was the AAA so controversial?
- 17 Why did farmers get worse off with the AAA?
- 18 Who was the Agriculture Secretary who described the wholesale destruction of crops and livestock as “a cleaning up of the wreckage from
- 19 What was the purpose of the National Industrial Recovery Act?
- 20 Why was the Agricultural Adjustment Act invalidated?
- 21 Why did the Supreme Court invalidate the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
- 22 How did the AAA help North Carolina?
- 23 Why were tractors important to the AAA?
- 24 How many tenant farmers were there in 1935?
- 25 What was the purpose of the AAA?
- 26 How did the New Deal affect North Carolina?
- 27 What was the second agricultural adjustment act?
- 28 Who is the author of The American Farmer and the New Deal?
- 29 What was the AAA tax?
- 30 How did the Great Depression affect farmers?
- 31 What were the two Supreme Court decisions in 1937?
- 32 What was the Supreme Court ruling in Mulford v. Smith?
- 33 What was the impact of the Depression on agriculture?
- 34 Who wrote the crisis in agriculture?
- 35 What was the AAA program?
- 36 How did the Agricultural Adjustment Act help farmers?
- 37 What was the purpose of the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
- 38 Why was the AAA unconstitutional?
- 39 Why did Roosevelt think the government was going to have to do more than simply purchase crops from farmers?
- 40 What was the AAA plan?
- 41 What group denounced the AAA?
- 42 Why did the U.S. government help farmers during the Great Depression?
- 43 How did the Agricultural Adjustment Administration work?
- 44 How much did the agricultural adjustment act affect farmers?
- 45 Why were Delta and Providence Cooperative Farms organized?
- 46 Why was the Agricultural Adjustment Act unconstitutional?
- 47 What agency oversees the distribution of the subsidies?
- 48 What was the New Deal law?
- 49 What happened to the agricultural surplus?
- 50 What was the purpose of the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
- 51 How did the AAA help farmers?
- 52 How many acres of farmland were insured in 2014?
- 53 What year did the Supreme Court strike down the AAA?
- 54 How much did peanuts cost in Georgia in 1932?
- 55 When was crop insurance introduced?
- 56 When was the AAA law struck down?
- 57 When did the Agricultural Adjustment Administration end?
- 58 What did farmers do in the short run?
- 59 When was the AAA enacted?
- 60 What caused the prices of farm products to drop steadily?
- 61 Purpose
- 62 Impact
- 63 Advantages
- 64 Facts
- 65 Significance
- 66 Other sources
- 67 New Deal Legislation
- 68 Judicial Review
- 69 Further Legislative Action
- 70 Bibliography
During its brief existence, the AAA accomplished its goal: the supply of crops decreased, and prices rose. It is now widely considered the most successful program of the New Deal. Though the AAA generally benefited North Carolina farmers, it harmed small farmers–in particular, African American tenant farmers.
What did the Agriculture Adjustment Administration do?
And although the AAA was intended to increase farm income, historian Jim Powell observes that farmers “actually found themselves worse off because FDR’s National Recovery Administration had been even more successful in forcing up the prices that consumers, including farmers, had to pay for manufactured goods.”
How did the Agricultural Adjustment help the farmers?
agricultural adjustment administration The generally booming national economy made it easy to ignore the farmers’ plight, but when the stock market crash of 1929 sparked the Great …
Why was the Agriculture Adjustment Act so important?
· The AAA was successful in the Great Depression because it was able to reduce supply so that it met demand and the price of food rose as a result. However, this came at an …
What was the main objective of the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) was a United States federal law of the New Deal era designed to boost agricultural prices by reducing surpluses. The government bought livestock …
How successful was the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
The AAA successfully increased crop prices. National cotton prices increased from 6.52 cents/pound in 1932 to 12.36 cents/pound in 1936. The price of peanuts, another important Georgia crop, increased from 1.55 cents/pound in 1932 to 3.72 cents/pound in 1936.
What did the Agricultural Adjustment Administration accomplish?
The Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) brought relief to farmers by paying them to curtail production, reducing surpluses, and raising prices for agricultural products.
Was the Agricultural Adjustment Act a recovery?
AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT ACT (Recovery) Created in 1933, he AAA paid farmers for not planting crops in order to reduce surpluses, increase demand for seven major farm commodities, and raise prices. Farm income rose, but many tenants and share-croppers were pushed into the ranks of the unemployed.
What were the results of the AAA?
The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) was a United States federal law of the New Deal era designed to boost agricultural prices by reducing surpluses. The government bought livestock for slaughter and paid farmers subsidies not to plant on part of their land.
What were the effects of the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
impact on debt slavery and sharecropping The Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 offered farmers money to produce less cotton in order to raise prices. Many white landowners kept the money and allowed the land previously worked by African American sharecroppers to remain empty.
Why did the Agricultural Adjustment Act end?
In the previous Friday Footnote, we learned about the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933. We ended the Footnote with a Supreme Court ruling in 1936 that invalidated the Act. The Court ruled that a special tax paid by food processors to fund the Act was unconstitutional.
Was the Works Progress Administration successful?
Over its eight years of existence, the WPA put roughly 8.5 million Americans to work. Perhaps best known for its public works projects, the WPA also sponsored projects in the arts – the agency employed tens of thousands of actors, musicians, writers and other artists.
How did the Agricultural Adjustment Act help farmers?
The Agricultural Adjustment Act helped farmers by increasing the value of their crops and livestock, helping agriculturalists to reap higher prices when they sold their products.
When did the Agricultural Adjustment Act end?
The Agricultural Adjustment Administration ended in 1942. Yet, federal farm support programs (marketing boards, acreage retirement, storage of surplus grain, etc.) that evolved from those original New Deal policies continued after the war, serving as pillars of American agricultural prosperity.
What were the effects of the Agricultural Adjustment Act quizlet?
The Agriculture Adjustment Act (AAA) gave farmers government payment, to grow fewer crops. A smaller supply of crops on the market would increase demand for those crops. This would drive prices up and help farmers earn money.
Did the Public Works Administration work?
The PWA spent over $6 billion but did not succeed in returning the level of industrial activity to pre-Depression levels. Though successful in many aspects, it has been acknowledged that the PWA’s objective of constructing a substantial number of quality, affordable housing units was a major failure.
Why was the AAA so controversial?
Economists have criticized the AAA for its ineffective production controls, for limiting American agricultural exports by pushing U.S. prices out of line with world prices, and for impeding adjustments in crop and livestock specializations.
Why did farmers get worse off with the AAA?
And although the AAA was intended to increase farm income, historian Jim Powell observes that farmers “actually found themselves worse off because FDR’s National Recovery Administration had been even more successful in forcing up the prices that consumers, including farmers, had to pay for manufactured goods.”.
Who was the Agriculture Secretary who described the wholesale destruction of crops and livestock as “a cleaning up of the wreckage from
Agriculture Secretary Henry Wallace described the wholesale destruction of crops and livestock as “a cleaning up of the wreckage from the old days of unbalanced production.” Wallace, of course, had special insight into precisely what quantity of production would bring things into “balance.”
What was the purpose of the National Industrial Recovery Act?
On the one hand, it sought to keep wage rates high to give the consumer greater “purchasing power.” On the other hand, it established hundreds of legally sanctioned, industry-wide cartels that were allowed to establish standard wages, hours of operation, and minimum prices. The minimum prices meant that businesses would be largely prevented from underselling each other; everyone’s price had to be at least the prescribed minimum. The artificially high wages meant continuing unemployment, and the high prices meant hardship for nearly all Americans. Some strategy for recovery.
Why was the Agricultural Adjustment Act invalidated?
Consequently, the Supreme Court invalidated the Agricultural Adjustment Act for its violation of the Commerce Clause. The Court’s decision led lawmakers to pass the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, which imposed marketing quotas and overproduction penalties rather than subsidies for farmers who limited production.
Why did the Supreme Court invalidate the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
Consequently, the Supreme Court invalidated the Agricultural Adjustment Act for its violation of the Commerce Clause.
How did the AAA help North Carolina?
Low crop prices had harmed U.S. farmers; reducing the supply of crops was a straightforward means of increasing prices. During its brief existence, the AAA accomplished its goal: the supply of crops decreased, and prices rose. It is now widely considered the most successful program of the New Deal. Though the AAA generally benefited North Carolina …
Why were tractors important to the AAA?
The creation of the AAA coincided also with the advent of modern farm implements. Tractors reduced landowners’ need to employ , or lease land to, sharecroppers or tenant farmers. Because AAA restrictions required landowners to leave much of their land fallow, some land had to be dug up. As tractors made it easier to landowners to raise crops on their own, land rented to sharecroppers and tenant farmers was often dug up. In 1935, there were 93,173 white tenant farmers and 49,985 African American tenant farmers in North Carolina. Over the next five years, the number of white tenant farmers dropped by nearly 12,000, and the number of African-Americans by 9,000.
How many tenant farmers were there in 1935?
In 1935, there were 93,173 white tenant farmers and 49,985 African American tenant farmers in North Carolina. Over the next five years, the number of white tenant farmers dropped by nearly 12,000, and the number of African-Americans by 9,000. The constitutionality of the AAA was challenged in United States v. Butler in 1936.
What was the purpose of the AAA?
The AAA’s limiting crop production method compensated farmers for leaving land fallow. Unlike the National Recovery Administration, which allowed industries to decide how to control production, the AAA was administrated by experts, most of them economists and agricultural engineers, who set production levels without input from farmers. By and large, this system of centralized control worked: the real income of the average farmer rose 30-percent during President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s first term. The Bankhead Act and the Kerr-Smith Act addressed non-compliance issues.
How did the New Deal affect North Carolina?
These New Deal policies may have harmed North Carolina’s vulnerable tenant farmers and sharecroppers. Recent studies of the AAA’s payments to farmers under the cotton program have shown that large planters were favored at the expense of smaller farmers. AAA benefit payments were paid out principally to landowners, who had legal obligations to compensate the tenant farmers and sharecroppers on their land. Enforcement of these obligations was lax or nonexistent.
What was the second agricultural adjustment act?
Emboldened by the apparent change in the Supreme Court’s attitude toward the constitutionality of the New Deal, Congress passed a second Agricultural Adjustment Act, designated as the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Rather than using the proceeds from taxes on processors to motivate farmers to lower production in exchange for benefit payments, the 1938 act applied marketing quotas and overproduction penalties directly. For example, the tobacco program established by the 1938 act triggered a national marketing quota whenever the secretary of agriculture determined that supplies would exceed a threshold called the “reserve supply level.” The secretary would apportion the quota among tobacco farms nationwide, and penalties would be assessed against auction warehouses marketing tobacco from a farm that had exceeded its quota.
Saloutos, Theodore . The American Farmer and the New Deal. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1982.
What was the AAA tax?
The AAA levied a tax on processors of agricultural commodities. Cotton gin operators, for instance, would be taxed for the benefit of cotton farmers who had agreed to reduce their acreage. The Department of Agriculture characterized this tax as “the heart of the law,” because the proceeds from this tax would simultaneously enhance farmers’ purchasing power and increase commodity prices by reducing supplies. To undertake the taxing of processors and to make benefit payments to participating farmers, the AAA relied on Article I, section 8, clause 1 of the Constitution, which empowers Congress “to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States .” Older decisions such as United States v. E.C. Knight Co. (1895) had established that Congress’s power under Article I, section 8, clause 3 “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes” did not extend to productive activities such as manufacturing, agriculture, and mining. In other words, the Constitution drew a distinction between regulating commerce and regulating production. When the Supreme Court invalidated the National Industrial Recovery Act in A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935), it not only endorsed that old distinction but also held that retailing likewise lay beyond Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce.
How did the Great Depression affect farmers?
T he Great Depression hit American farmers especially hard. With prices of commodities and farmers’ income at historic lows, the Dust Bowl destroyed what little productivity was left in many farms. White farmers from Oklahoma joined the exodus that black farmers from the Mississippi Delta had already begun during the 1920s. The agricultural crisis profoundly affected the 1932 presidential campaign. During his successful run for the presidency, Franklin D. Roosevelt promised comprehensive agricultural relief.
What were the two Supreme Court decisions in 1937?
Two Supreme Court decisions rendered that year greatly expanded Congress’s ability to regulate commerce and to attach conditions to federal expenditures. NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937) upheld the National Labor Relations Act as a proper exercise of Congress’s commerce clause powers, and Steward Machine Co. v. Davis (1937) upheld the Social Security Act (despite objections similar to those raised in Butler. ) Meanwhile, minor agricultural statutes were surviving Supreme Court review. In Wright v. Vinton Branch of the Mountain Trust Bank (1937), the Court upheld the Farm Bankruptcy Act of 1935. In 1939 the Court upheld both the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act ( United States v. Rock-Royal Cooperative, Inc. ) and the Tobacco Inspection Act ( Currin v. Wallace. )
What was the Supreme Court ruling in Mulford v. Smith?
In Mulford v. Smith (1939), the Supreme Court upheld the 1938 act with little fanfare. Even though the marketing quotas imposed by the 1938 act intruded far more aggressively into the agricultural economy than the processing taxes at issue in the 1933 act, Mulford found no fault in the 1938 act. Just three years earlier the 1933 act had been condemned as an unconstitutional stratagem by the federal government to interfere in agricultural markets. Yet the ruling in Mulford blessed the 1938 act as a program “intended to foster, protect and conserve [interstate] commerce.”
What was the impact of the Depression on agriculture?
A decade-long agricultural depression sparked by plunging crop and livestock prices inspired President Franklin D. Roosevelt and New Deal reformers in 1933 to implement the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, the first federal program to limit agricultural production. The dramatic expansion of exports during World War I–beef exports increased more than 100 percent, wheat exports more than doubled, and oats exports soared more than 2,400 percent–led to record prices and the cultivation of millions of acres of previously unused land. With peace and the recovery of European agriculture, demand and prices dropped quickly: corn fell from $1.20 per bushel in 1917 to 26 cents in 1921, while wheat, hogs, and cattle fell to prewar averages. At the same time, the earning power of the nation’s farmers declined, land prices plummeted, and thousands of Great Plains banks failed.
Who wrote the crisis in agriculture?
Perkins, Van L. Crisis in Agriculture: The Agricultural Adjustment Administration and the New Deal, 1933. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
What was the AAA program?
Administered by county extension agents and farmers committees, the program was paid for by a tax on processors of agricultural products.
How did the Agricultural Adjustment Act help farmers?
The Agricultural Adjustment Act helped farmers by raising the prices of crops and paying them for land not used. Roosevelt wanted farmers to reduce how much of their land they farmed on and the U.S. government paid farmers directly for the money they would have made if they farmed the vacant land. This also helped farmers in the long run by raising the prices of crops artificially. However, farmers who did not own the land they farmed on were severely hurt by the act.
What was the purpose of the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
This act was designed to artificially raise the price of crops and Roosevelt planned to achieve this by limiting how much each farmer could produce.
Why was the AAA unconstitutional?
The AAA was declared unconstitutional because it taxes the processors of the food industry such as flour mills and slaughterhouses in order to benefit the farmers. This was unconstitutional because it was harming one group in favor of another.
Why did Roosevelt think the government was going to have to do more than simply purchase crops from farmers?
Once Roosevelt became President in 1933, the strategy to help the farmers of the United States completely changed. Because farmers were struggling for a decade before the Great Depression, Roosevelt thought the government was going to have to do more than simply purchase crops from farmers. The original reason farmers were struggling in the first place was because they were producing too much and this drove the price of crops down. During this Great Depression, this price sunk even further as people began to purchase as little food as possible.
What was the AAA plan?
Once the AAA was signed into law, the Department of Agriculture created a plan called the ‘domestic allotment’ which would raise the price of food for farmers. The size of individual markets was determined, such as cotton, wheat, or pork, and the land needed to produce this food was allotted over the entire country. This means that farmers would be told that they could only farm on a specific portion of their land or only a certain number of pigs could be raised in a given year. This lead to the slaughter of millions of livestock and the destruction of thousands of acres of crops. At a time of extreme poverty, destroying crops and food was an incredibly controversial thing to be doing. Paying farmers not to plant crops was a politically risky move but readjusting the Agricultural industry was deemed too important.
What group denounced the AAA?
Another group that denounced the AAA was the processors of food such as flour mills and slaughterhouses. This was because they had to pay a tax, called the processor tax, which was used to pay the farmers to let their land lie fallow. This industry asserted that it was not legal that they should have to pay money to help another industry such as farmers.
Why did the U.S. government help farmers during the Great Depression?
He would have rather companies and wealthy Americans voluntarily aided in the economic collapse. Because of this, the only help that farmers got under Hoover was that the U.S. government agreed to purchase a large amount of food directly from the farmers. This would ensure that farmers would get some money, however, this funding was strictly given in exchange for something the farmers produced .
How did the Agricultural Adjustment Administration work?
The government bought livestock for slaughter and paid farmers subsidies not to plant on part of their land. The money for these subsidies was generated through an exclusive tax on companies which processed farm products. The Act created a new agency, the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, an agency of the U.S.
How much did the agricultural adjustment act affect farmers?
The Agricultural Adjustment Act affected nearly all of the farmers in this time period. (Around 99%).
Why were Delta and Providence Cooperative Farms organized?
Delta and Providence Cooperative Farms in Mississippi and the Southern Tenant Farmers Union were organized in the 1930s principally as a response to the hardships imposed on sharecroppers and tenant farmers. Although the Act stimulated American agriculture, it was not without its faults.
Why was the Agricultural Adjustment Act unconstitutional?
Butler that the act was unconstitutional for levying this tax on the processors only to have it paid back to the farmers. Regulation of agriculture was deemed a state power. As such, the federal government could not force states to adopt the Agricultural Adjustment Act due to lack of jurisdiction.
What agency oversees the distribution of the subsidies?
The Act created a new agency, the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, to oversee the distribution of the subsidies. The Agriculture Marketing Act, which established the Federal Farm Board in 1929, was seen as an important precursor to this act. The AAA, along with other New Deal programs, …
What was the New Deal law?
United States federal law of the New Deal era. This article is about the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933. For the act by the same name in 1938, see Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938.
What happened to the agricultural surplus?
For example, in an effort to reduce agricultural surpluses, the government paid farmers to reduce crop production and to sell pregnant sows as well as young pigs. Oranges were being soaked with kerosene to prevent their consumption and corn was being burned as fuel because it was so cheap. There were many people , however, as well as livestock in different places starving to death. Farmers slaughtered livestock because feed prices were rising, and they could not afford to feed their own animals. Under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, “plowing under” of pigs was also common to prevent them reaching a reproductive age, as well as donating pigs to the Red Cross.
What was the purpose of the Agricultural Adjustment Act?
president Franklin D. Roosevelt ’s New Deal. The law offered farmers subsidies in exchange for limiting their production of certain crops. The subsidies were meant to limit overproduction so that crop prices could increase.
How did the AAA help farmers?
The subsidies were paid for by a tax on the companies that processed the crops. By limiting the supply of target crops—specifically, corn, cotton, milk, peanuts, rice, tobacco, and wheat—the government hoped to increase crop prices and keep farmers financially afloat. The AAA successfully increased crop prices.
How many acres of farmland were insured in 2014?
In 2014, 2.86 million acres of farmland were insured in Georgia. Cotton, peanuts, and soybeans are the most insured crops in the state by acreage, and more than 95 percent of Georgia’s peanut, cotton, and tobacco acreage was insured in 2014. Media Gallery: Agricultural Adjustment Act. Hide Caption. Cotton Farmers.
What year did the Supreme Court strike down the AAA?
Soybeans. 1936 the Supreme Court struck down the AAA, finding that it was illegal to tax one group—the processors—in order to pay another group—the farmers. Despite this setback, the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 had set the stage for nearly a century of federal crop subsidies and crop insurance.
How much did peanuts cost in Georgia in 1932?
The price of peanuts, another important Georgia crop, increased from 1.55 cents/pound in 1932 to 3.72 cents/pound in 1936. These gains were not distributed equally, however, among all Georgia’s farmers. Subsidies were distributed to landowners, not to sharecroppers, who were abundant in Georgia.
When was crop insurance introduced?
Crop insurance was included in the new Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, which paid subsidies from general tax revenues instead of taxes on producers. The legacy of crop subsidies and crop insurance continues well into the twenty-first century.
When was the AAA law struck down?
After the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the AAA in January 1936, a slightly modified version of the law was passed in 1938. The program was largely successful at raising crop prices, though it had the unintended consequence of inordinately favoring large landowners over sharecroppers.
When did the Agricultural Adjustment Administration end?
The Agricultural Adjustment Administration ended in 1942. Yet, federal farm support programs (marketing boards, acreage retirement, storage of surplus grain, etc.) that evolved from those original New Deal policies continued after the war, serving as pillars of American agricultural prosperity.
What did farmers do in the short run?
In the short run, farmers were paid to destroy crops and livestock, which led to depressing scenes of fields plowed under, corn burned as fuel and piglets slaughtered. Nevertheless, many of the farm products removed from economic circulation were utilized in productive ways.
When was the AAA enacted?
A new AAA was enacted in 1938 which remedied the problems highlighted by the court and allowed agricultural support programs to continue, while adding a provision for crop insurance.
What caused the prices of farm products to drop steadily?
Large agricultural surpluses during the 1920s had caused prices for farm products to drop steadily from the highs of the First World War, and with the onset of the Great Depression the bottom dropped out of agricultural markets.
Purpose
-
Created by the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) was a New Deal agency tasked with controlling crop yields. Low crop prices had harmed U.S. farmers; reducing the supply of crops was a straightforward means of increasing prices. During its brief existence, the AAA accomplished its goal: the supply …
See more on northcarolinahistory.org
Impact
-
The impact of the AAA in North Carolina was profound. At the start of the Great Depression, four out of ten North Carolinians worked on a farm. Of the stateâs 280,000 farms, roughly a third grew tobacco, and more than a third grew cotton. By 1932, cotton was not as profitable as tobacco, and tobacco was losing profitability as farmers struggled to negotiate prices with cigarette producer…
Advantages
-
The creation of the AAA coincided also with the advent of modern farm implements. Tractors reduced landowners need to employ, or lease land to, sharecroppers or tenant farmers. Because AAA restrictions required landowners to leave much of their land fallow, some land had to be dug up. As tractors made it easier to landowners to raise crops on their own, land rented to sharecr…
Facts
-
The constitutionality of the AAA was challenged in United States v. Butler in 1936. In this case, a cotton-processing company in Hoosac Mills, Massachusetts argued that the AAA had no right to collect its tax because its money was used to regulate intrastate commerce. Consequently, the Supreme Court invalidated the Agricultural Adjustment Act for its violation of the Commerce Cla…
Significance
-
The Courtâs decision led lawmakers to pass the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, which imposed marketing quotas and overproduction penalties rather than subsidies for farmers who limited production. The 1938 act was upheld in the Supreme Court case Mulford v. Smith (1939) because the new program, the Court ruled, was intended to foster, protect and conserve [intersta…
Other sources
-
Douglas Carl Abrams, Conservative Constraints: North Carolina and the New Deal (Jackson, Mississippi: 1992); Anthony J. Badger, Prosperity Road: The New Deal, Tobacco and North Carolina (Chapel Hill, North Carolina: 1980); Badger, North Carolina and the New Deal (Raleigh, North Carolina: 1981); David Ciepley, Liberalism in the Shadow of Totalitarianism (Cambridge, M…
New Deal Legislation
Judicial Review
-
In United States v. Butler (1936), the Supreme Court invalidated the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933. Justice Owen Roberts, writing for himself and five other justices, held that the AAA “invade[d] the reserved rights of the states” by endeavoring “to regulate and control agricultural production, a matter beyond the powers delegated to the federal government.” Specifically, the C…
Further Legislative Action
-
Emboldened by the apparent change in the Supreme Court’s attitude toward the constitutionality of the New Deal, Congress passed a second Agricultural Adjustment Act, designated as the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Rather than using the proceeds from taxes on processors to motivate farmers to lower production in exchange for benefit payments, the 1938 act applied m…
Bibliography
-
Breimyer, Harold F. “Agricultural Philosophies and Policies in the New Deal.” Minnesota Law Review68 (1983): 333-353. Fite, Gilbert Courtland. American Farmers: The New Minority.Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1981. Irons, Peter H. The New Deal Lawyers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UniversityPress, 1982. Rasmussen, Wayne D. “New Deal Agricultural Po…