Contents
- 1 What are the trends of capitalism in agriculture?
- 2 Who is agriculture capital?
- 3 Is capitalist agriculture destroying the European farmers?
- 4 Is capitalism ruining agriculture according to Kautsky?
- 5 Why is agriculture important?
- 6 What is conservation agriculture?
- 7 What is sustainability in agriculture?
- 8 Why should the government increase scholarships for agriculture students?
- 9 How many students are in agriculture?
- 10 Is intensive agriculture a form of intensive agriculture?
- 11 Did agriculture have a birth place?
- 12 What are the main features of feudal agriculture?
- 13 How does natural economy change with commodity economy?
- 14 Who said it is absurd to expect that the peasant in modern societywiII go over to communal
- 15 Is Kautsky’s statement that “the tenant farmer system is developed are also countries in which large land ownership
- 16 Learn about this topic in these articles
- 17 use in Europe
- 18 What is capital led agriculture?
- 19 Can companies externalize the costs of their epidemiologically dangerous operations?
- 20 Is there a capital free pathogen?
- 21 Is Planet Earth a farm?
- 22 What is capital led agriculture?
- 23 What is a socialist biologist?
- 24 Is there a capital free pathogen?
- 25 Can companies externalize the costs of their epidemiologically dangerous operations?
- 26 Is Planet Earth a farm?
Capitalist farming may develop by drawing labour from tenant households or from independent peasants. Capitalists’ control of labour-power, of land and of access to markets and state support will be constrained by the competing claims of peasant households. The “transition to capitalism in agriculture” may take a variety of forms.
What are the trends of capitalism in agriculture?
· In modern capitalism, a more relevant scale is farm capitalization: the amounts of capital required to establish different types of farming – their ‘entry costs’ in economists’ terms – and to reproduce them.6. It is this notion of capitalization which – perhaps unsurprisingly – helps make the most sense of capitalist agriculture.
Who is agriculture capital?
Furthermore, the monopoly in Ianded property limits agricultural capitalism: in industry, capital grows as a result of accumulation, as a result of the conversion of surplus-value into capital; centralisation, i.e., the amalgamation of several small units …
Is capitalist agriculture destroying the European farmers?
Europarl8. In Capital, Volume I, he wrote: …all progress in capitalistic agriculture is a progress in the art, not only of robbing the labourer, but of robbing the soil; all progress in increasing the …
Is capitalism ruining agriculture according to Kautsky?
operating with varying intensity – of an expanding market and enhanced profitability of agricultural production. The rate at which capitalist development is occurring varies widely in …
Why is agriculture important?
Agriculture is very important because it forms the basic of all the food consumed by everybody. It is very important because it creates employment to the unemployed citizens of the country. Agriculture provides raw materials to the agro-based industries.
What is conservation agriculture?
Conservation agriculture is related to conservation of natural resources like water , soil , seed and biodiversity.
What is sustainability in agriculture?
Sustainability is a term for society for example a farmer is conserving water and soil and using OP seeds but his kids can’t go to school because of lack of money. Or his wife is anaemic due to lack of proper diet . He has no money to provide medical aid to his parents. He is growing cotton or coffee in third world and getting less than 5 Percent share in price paid by end consumer ..for example he gets 1.5 dollar for his cotton used to make a 40 dollar T-Shirt. Here co
Why should the government increase scholarships for agriculture students?
Both the government and the corporate sector must increase the number of scholarships for agriculture students to enhance research and development. This will help them become better professionals and improve their earning capacities. The government must also enhance their professional status so that more youth take up jobs in this sector.
How many students are in agriculture?
At present, around 0.4 million students are enrolled in agricultural universities and institutes. But sadly, only 0.1 million students manage to graduate. Most of them (between 70 and 80 per cent) join the banking sector.
Is intensive agriculture a form of intensive agriculture?
It may be intensive agriculture where the land is farmed to its maximum and the population is dense .Frequently irrigation agriculture is part of this. It may be extensive where the population is dispersed and the land is used for grazing or growing large scale cereals using a lot of machinery.
Did agriculture have a birth place?
Agriculture didn’t have a singular “birth place”. It developed independently in several places and times. Some of these include the “fertile cresent” of Mesopotamia, Egypt’s Nile Valley and most of the other river systems of Africa, China’s River systems, in SE Asia, the Mekong, in India, the Buhamputra and the Ganges and others. In the Americas, the Mississippi river valley, the Delaware River valley, the Central Valley of California, the Rio Grande and many others, as well as rivers in South America. Some of the earliest agricultural products included grains like wheat, rye oats, rice, spelt
What are the main features of feudal agriculture?
After describing (in Chapter III) the main features of feudal agriculture: the predominance of the three-field system, the most conservative system in agriculture; the oppression and expropriation of the peasantry by the big landed aristocracy; the organisation of feudal-capitalist farming by the latter ; the transformation of the peasantry into starving paupers (Hungerleider) in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; the development of bourgeois peasants ( Grossbauern, who cannot manage without regular farm labourers and day labourers), for whom the old forms of rural relations and land tenure were unsuitable; the abolition of these forms and the paving of the way for “capitalist, intensive farming” (S.26) by the forces of the bourgeois class which had developed in the womb of industry and the towns — after describing all this, Kautsky goes on to characterise “modern agriculture” (Chapter IV).
How does natural economy change with commodity economy?
free from exploitation” (S.165). The situation changes when natural economy is supplanted by commodity economy. The peasant then has to sell his produce, purchase implements, and purchase land. As long as the peasant remains a simple commodity producer, he can be satisfied with the standard of living of the wage-worker; he needs neither profit nor rent; he can pay a higher price for land than the capitalist entrepreneur (S.166). But simple commodity production is supplanted by capitalist production. If, for instance, the peasant has mortgaged his land, he must also obtain the rent which he has sold to the creditor. At this stage of development the peasant can only formally be regarded as a simp!e commodity producer. De facto, he usually has to deal with the capitalist– the creditor, the merchant, the industrial entrepreneur — from whom he must seek “auxiliary employment,” .i.e., to whom he must sell his labour-power. At this stage — and Kautsky, we repeat, compares large-scale with small scale farming in capitalist society — the possibility for the peasant “not to count his labour” means only one thing to him, namely, to work himself to death and continually to cut down his consumption.
Who said it is absurd to expect that the peasant in modern societywiII go over to communal
also among the Russian “commune” peasants (recall A. N. Engelhardt and G. Uspensky). Kautsky categorically declares that “it is absurd to expect that the peasant in modern societywiII go over to communal production” (S.129).
Is Kautsky’s statement that “the tenant farmer system is developed are also countries in which large land ownership
Bulgakov also declares that Kautsky’s statement that “countries in which the tenant farmer system is developed are also countries in which large land ownership predominates” (S.88) is “still more unexpected” and “altogether untrue.” Kautsky speaks here of the concentration of land ownership (under the tenant farmer system) and the concentration of mortgages (under the system in which the landowners manage their own farms) as conditions that facilitate the abolition of the private ownership of land. On the question of concentration of land ownership, continues Kautsky, there are no statistics “which would enable one to trace the amalgamation of several properties in single hands”; but “in general it may be taken” that the increase in the number of leases and in the area of the leased land proceeds side by side with concentration of land ownership. “Countries in which the tenant farmer system is developed are also countries in which large land ownership predominates .”
Learn about this topic in these articles
The capital-intensive agriculture of such western countries as the Netherlands and the United Kingdom produced markedly higher yields per acre and per person than the extensive Soviet system, despite the benefits—notably mechanization—brought by collectivization. With the dissolution of the communist bloc, the system in eastern Europe…
use in Europe
The capital-intensive agriculture of such western countries as the Netherlands and the United Kingdom produced markedly higher yields per acre and per person than the extensive Soviet system, despite the benefits—notably mechanization—brought by collectivization. With the dissolution of the communist bloc, the system in eastern Europe…
What is capital led agriculture?
The capital-led agriculture that replaces more natural ecologies offers the exact means by which pathogens can evolve the most virulent and infectious phenotypes. You couldn’t design a better system to breed deadly diseases.
Can companies externalize the costs of their epidemiologically dangerous operations?
These companies can just external ize the costs of their epidemiologically dangerous operations on everyone else. From the animals themselves to consumers, farmworkers, local environments, and governments across jurisdictions. The damages are so extensive that if we were to return those costs onto company balance sheets, agribusiness as we know it would be ended forever. No company could support the costs of the damage it imposes.
Is there a capital free pathogen?
There are no capital-free pathogens at this point. Even the most remote are affected, if distally. Ebola, Zika, the coronaviruses, yellow fever again, a variety of avian influenzas, and African swine fever in hog are among the many pathogens making their way out of the most remote hinterlands into peri-urban loops, regional capitals, and ultimately onto the global travel network. From fruit bats in the Congo to killing Miami sunbathers in a few weeks‘ time.
Is Planet Earth a farm?
Planet Earth is largely Planet Farm at this point, in both biomass and land used. Agribusiness is aiming to corner the food market. The near-entirety of the neoliberal project is organized around supporting efforts by companies based in the in the more advanced industrialised countries to steal the land and resources of weaker countries. As a result, many of those new pathogens previously held in check by long-evolved forest ecologies are being sprung free, threatening the whole world.
What is capital led agriculture?
The capital-led agriculture that replaces more natural ecologies offers the exact means by which pathogens can evolve the most virulent and infectious phenotypes. You couldn’t design a better system to breed deadly diseases.
A socialist biologist explains the tight links between new viruses, industrial food production, and the profitability of multinational corporations.
Is there a capital free pathogen?
There are no capital-free pathogens at this point. Even the most remote are affected, if distally. Ebola, Zika, the coronaviruses, yellow fever again, a variety of avian influenzas, and African swine fever in hog are among the many pathogens making their way out of the most remote hinterlands into peri-urban loops, regional capitals, and ultimately onto the global travel network. From fruit bats in the Congo to killing Miami sunbathers in a few weeks‘ time.
Can companies externalize the costs of their epidemiologically dangerous operations?
These companies can just external ize the costs of their epidemiologically dangerous operations on everyone else. From the animals themselves to consumers, farmworkers, local environments, and governments across jurisdictions. The damages are so extensive that if we were to return those costs onto company balance sheets, agribusiness as we know it would be ended forever. No company could support the costs of the damage it imposes.
Is Planet Earth a farm?
Planet Earth is largely Planet Farm at this point, in both biomass and land used. Agribusiness is aiming to corner the food market. The near-entirety of the neoliberal project is organized around supporting efforts by companies based in the in the more advanced industrialised countries to steal the land and resources of weaker countries. As a result, many of those new pathogens previously held in check by long-evolved forest ecologies are being sprung free, threatening the whole world.