What was a result of the agricultural or neolithic revolution


The agricultural revolution had a variety of consequences for humans. It has been linked to everything from societal inequality—a result of humans’ increased dependence on the land and fears of scarcity—to a decline in nutrition and a rise in infectious diseases contracted from domesticated animals.Apr 5, 2019


How did Neolithic agriculture revolution change peoples lives?

The Neolithic Revolution changed the way humans lived. The use of agriculture allowed humans to develop permanent settlements, social classes, and new technologies. Some of these early groups settled in the fertile valleys of the Nile, Tigris-Euphrates, Yellow, and Indus Rivers.

What were factors that contributed to the Neolithic Revolution?

Reader view

  • Conclusion. In conclusion, the Neolithic Revolution was a very big development in the history of humans. …
  • Animals
  • Introduction. The early humans learned a lot about how to use animals to their advantage. …
  • Causes. There was not enough meat to feed everyone there. …
  • Effects. It created agriculture and more organized civilization. …
  • Farming. …

What was bad about the Agricultural Revolution?

When the Agricultural Revolution occurred, the combination of overcrowding of both humans and domesticated animals and switching to an unvaried cereal- and grain-based diet caused an assortment of health issues.

Was the Neolithic Revolution good or bad?

Was the Neolithic Revolution good or bad? The Neolithic Revolution was probably the most influential and positive occurrence in human history. Much of what defines society today was first born in the Neolithic Revolution and one could go so far as to say that it was during this revolution that the very definition of civilization was born.


What is the result of the Neolithic Agricultural Revolution?

The Neolithic Revolution was the critical transition that resulted in the birth of agriculture, taking Homo sapiens from scattered groups of hunter-gatherers to farming villages and from there to technologically sophisticated societies with great temples and towers and kings and priests who directed the labor of their …

What were the major results of the Agricultural Revolution?

The Agricultural Revolution of the 18th century paved the way for the Industrial Revolution in Britain. New farming techniques and improved livestock breeding led to amplified food production. This allowed a spike in population and increased health. The new farming techniques also led to an enclosure movement.

What were 4 Effects of the Neolithic Revolution?

This included climate change, the need for food, cultivation of crops, and domestication of animals. When the Ice Age ended, there was an increase of rainfall, became warmer in general, and had more stable climatic conditions.

What were 2 effects of the Agricultural Revolution?

The agricultural revolution had a variety of consequences for humans. It has been linked to everything from societal inequality—a result of humans’ increased dependence on the land and fears of scarcity—to a decline in nutrition and a rise in infectious diseases contracted from domesticated animals.

What were three effects of the Agricultural Revolution?

This transition included going from hand production methods to machines, new chemical manufacturing and iron production processes, improved efficiency of water power, the increasing use of steam power, the development of machine tools and the rise of the factory system.

What were three effects of the Neolithic era?

The three effects of the Neolithic Revolution were as follows: Mass establishment of permanent settlements. Domestication of plants and animals. Advancements in tools for farming, war and art.

Which of the following most directly resulted from the Neolithic Revolution?

Which of the following most directly resulted from the Neolithic Revolution? Populations increased.

What was the role of hunters in the Neolithic era?

During the Neolithic period, hunter-gatherers roamed the natural world, foraging for their food. But then a dramatic shift occurred. The foragers became farmers, transitioning from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to a more settled one.

What was the shift to agriculture from hunting and gathering called?

Also called the Agricultural Revolution, the shift to agriculture from hunting and gathering changed humanity forever. By Erin Blakemore.

When did humans start farming?

Humans are thought to have gathered plants and their seeds as early as 23,000 years ago, and to have started farming cereal grains like barley as early as 11,000 years ago . Afterward, they moved on to protein-rich foods like peas and lentils.

When did humans start domesticating animals?

Evidence of sheep and goat herding has been found in Iraq and Anatolia (modern-day Turkey) as far back as about 12,000 years ago.

What was the Neolithic Revolution?

e. The Neolithic Revolution, or the ( First) Agricultural Revolution, was the wide-scale transition of many human cultures during the Neolithic period from a lifestyle of hunting and gathering to one of agriculture and settlement, making an increasingly large population possible .

How did the Neolithic Revolution affect human nutrition?

The Neolithic Revolution greatly narrowed the diversity of foods available, resulting in a downturn in the quality of human nutrition. The Neolithic Revolution involved far more than the adoption of a limited set of food-producing techniques.

What animals were domesticated in the Middle East?

The Middle East served as the source for many animals that could be domesticated, such as sheep, goats and pigs. This area was also the first region to domesticate the dromedary. Henri Fleisch discovered and termed the Shepherd Neolithic flint industry from the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon and suggested that it could have been used by the earliest nomadic shepherds. He dated this industry to the Epipaleolithic or Pre-Pottery Neolithic as it is evidently not Paleolithic, Mesolithic or even Pottery Neolithic. The presence of these animals gave the region a large advantage in cultural and economic development. As the climate in the Middle East changed and became drier, many of the farmers were forced to leave, taking their domesticated animals with them. It was this massive emigration from the Middle East that later helped distribute these animals to the rest of Afroeurasia. This emigration was mainly on an east–west axis of similar climates, as crops usually have a narrow optimal climatic range outside of which they cannot grow for reasons of light or rain changes. For instance, wheat does not normally grow in tropical climates, just like tropical crops such as bananas do not grow in colder climates. Some authors, like Jared Diamond, have postulated that this east–west axis is the main reason why plant and animal domestication spread so quickly from the Fertile Crescent to the rest of Eurasia and North Africa, while it did not reach through the north–south axis of Africa to reach the Mediterranean climates of South Africa, where temperate crops were successfully imported by ships in the last 500 years. Similarly, the African Zebu of central Africa and the domesticated bovines of the fertile-crescent – separated by the dry sahara desert – were not introduced into each other’s region.

What were the causes of the rise in deaths and sickness following the Neolithic Revolution?

Inadequate sanitary practices and the domestication of animals may explain the rise in deaths and sickness following the Neolithic Revolution, as diseases jumped from the animal to the human population. Some examples of infectious diseases spread from animals to humans are influenza, smallpox, and measles.

What is secondary product revolution?

Andrew Sherratt has argued that following upon the Neolithic Revolution was a second phase of discovery that he refers to as the secondary products revolution. Animals, it appears, were first domesticated purely as a source of meat. The Secondary Products Revolution occurred when it was recognised that animals also provided a number of other useful products. These included:

How did Europeans and East Asians benefit from the Neolithic Revolution?

In his book Guns, Germs, and Steel, Jared Diamond argues that Europeans and East Asians benefited from an advantageous geographical location that afforded them a head start in the Neolithic Revolution. Both shared the temperate climate ideal for the first agricultural settings, both were near a number of easily domesticable plant and animal species, and both were safer from attacks of other people than civilizations in the middle part of the Eurasian continent. Being among the first to adopt agriculture and sedentary lifestyles, and neighboring other early agricultural societies with whom they could compete and trade, both Europeans and East Asians were also among the first to benefit from technologies such as firearms and steel swords.

What were the first crops that Daniel Zohary identified?

Daniel Zohary identified several plant species as “pioneer crops” or Neolithic founder crops. He highlighted the importance of wheat, barley and rye, and suggested that domestication of flax, peas, chickpeas, bitter vetch and lentils came a little later.


1) Sheep originated in the Central Asian agricultural hearth over 9,000 years ago, but today are found in other places such as North America. This phenomenon is best explained by A. diffusion. B. breeding. C. migration. D. climate


Triangle ABC is reflected over the y-axis what are the coordinates of the reflected triangle describe in words what happens to the x coordinates and the y coordinates of the original triangle’s vertices as a result of this

World History A

How did the Neolithic Revolution encourage the growth of civilization? a) by compelling people to trade b) by providing a stable food source ** c) by ending interest in migration d) by removing a source of conflict this is the


A. Triangle ABC is reflected over the y-axis. What are the coordinates of the reflected triangle? B. Describe in words what happens to the x-coordinates and y-coordinates of the original triangle’s vertices as a result of this

history civilization thesis help

The agricultural revolution marked a decisive turning point in human history. What evidence might you offer to support this claim, and how might you argue against it? That’s the essay question. I’m in college so i’m expected to


As populations changed during the Neolithic Revolution, which became the earliest form of government at Catalhuyuk? A. a council of female elders B. a pair of village chiefs C. a council of male elders D. a pair of elite warriors


All of the following are the result of the increase in large-scale, green revolution agriculture in the region, except: A. more than 2 million small farmers have been forced to sell their land in Brazil alone since 1985. B. there




Despite the significant technological advance, the Neolithic revolution did not lead immediately to a rapid growth of population. Its benefits appear to have been offset by various adverse effects, mostly diseases and warfare.
The introduction of agriculture has not necessarily led to unequivocal progress. The nutritional standards of the growing Neolithic populations were inferior to …


Hunter-gatherers had different subsistence requirements and lifestyles from agriculturalists. They were often highly mobile, living in temporary shelters, moving in small groups, and having limited contact with outsiders. Their diet was well-balanced and depended on what the environment provided each season. Because the advent of agriculture made it possible to support larger groups, agriculturalists lived in more permanent dwellings in areas that were more densely popu…

Agricultural transition

The term ‘neolithic revolution’ was coined by V. Gordon Childe in his 1936 book Man Makes Himself. Childe introduced it as the first in a series of agricultural revolutions in Middle Eastern history, calling it a “revolution” to denote its significance, the degree of change to communities adopting and refining agricultural practices.

Early harvesting of cereals (23,000 BP)

Use-wear analysis of five glossed flint blades found at Ohalo II, a 23,000-years-old fisher-hunter-gatherers’ camp on the shore of the Sea of Galilee, Northern Israel, provides the earliest evidence for the use of composite cereal harvesting tools. The Ohalo site is at the junction of the Upper Paleolithic and the Early Epipaleolithic, and has been attributed to both periods.

Domestication of plants

Once agriculture started gaining momentum, around 9000 BP, human activity resulted in the selective breeding of cereal grasses (beginning with emmer, einkorn and barley), and not simply of those that favoured greater caloric returns through larger seeds. Plants with traits such as small seeds or bitter taste were seen as undesirable. Plants that rapidly shed their seeds on maturity tended n…

Development and diffusion

Agriculture appeared first in Southwest Asia about 2,000 years later, around 10,000–9,000 years ago. The region was the centre of domestication for three cereals (einkorn wheat, emmer wheat and barley), four legumes (lentil, pea, bitter vetch and chickpea), and flax. Domestication was a slow process that unfolded across multiple regions, and was preceded by centuries if not millennia of …

Domestication of animals

When hunter-gathering began to be replaced by sedentary food production it became more efficient to keep animals close at hand. Therefore, it became necessary to bring animals permanently to their settlements, although in many cases there was a distinction between relatively sedentary farmers and nomadic herders. The animals’ size, temperament, diet, mating patterns, and life span w…

Leave a Comment